- **Rally for "Great England"**: A large rally took place in Trafalgar Square with attendees advocating for a return to traditional British values, criticizing current immigration policies, and expressing frustration with the government.
- **Focus on Immigration**: Many participants criticized illegal immigration, claiming it is causing economic strain and increased crime. They argued that the government is failing to manage immigration effectively and is neglecting British citizens, including the homeless.
- **Protests and Counter-Protests**: The event saw significant police presence due to expected counter-protests. Attendees were divided, with some seeing the rally as a defense of British culture and others viewing it as a platform for extremist views.
- **Claims of Racism and Misrepresentation**: The rally's organizers were labeled as racist and fascist by critics, but supporters argued that their concerns were about preserving national values rather than racism.
- **Calls for Unity and Policy Changes**: Attendees called for stricter immigration controls, better management of public resources, and a return to traditional values. They also expressed dissatisfaction with media portrayal and political leaders, advocating for a more unified and culturally preserved Britain.
The painting's dark tones and tumultuous atmosphere reflect the turmoil of the Peninsular War (1808-1814), a period of great conflict in Spain during which Goya created many works.
戦争を象徴していたのかも？
In "Azrael," she depicts the Angel of Death not as a terrifying figure, but as a gentle and benevolent presence. This painting aligns with De Morgan’s spiritualist beliefs that death is a transition to be embraced rather than feared.
Munch was inspired to create this painting after a walk during sunset when he experienced a profound sense of anxiety. He described the sky turning "blood red" and feeling a "great scream pass through nature."
Do not repay evil with evil or insult with insult.は正しいんだけど、相手が分かるような表現で、自分の品格を下げないようなしかたで、毅然とした対応なりある種の合法的正当な「報復」は必要・・・・・相手はこっちが嫌がっている、怒っている、ということがわからせないと。
Editor’s note (July 30th): We have not yet seen enough polls to draw a new over-time trend since Kamala Harris became the presumptive Democratic nominee. This chart still shows the contest between Mr Trump and Mr Biden.
Israeli sources are now confirming the horrific CNN and New York Times reports of the conditions in Sde Taiman. They include electric shocks, amputations due to bad conditions, severe beatings, , surgery without anesthesia, playing loud music until inmates ears bleed, deaths due…
Sportswashing is a term used to describe the practice of nations, individuals, groups, corporations, or governments using sports to improve reputations tarnished by wrongdoing.
— ParkSJ 朴勝俊 Anti Austerity, Anti Nuclear, GND (@psj95708651) July 29, 2024
Dr. Steve Keen
@ProfSteveKeen
When the government saves, it takes money out of your pocket. This forces you to borrow more from banks to maintain your standard of living. Over time, this leads to rising private debt and economic stagnation.
The mainstream belief is that government surpluses are good for the economy. But this is kindergarten thinking. The reality is that sustained government surpluses lead to economic crises. Just look at Greece, Spain, Italy, and France. They followed this flawed advice and ended up in economic turmoil. Instead, governments should run deficits to inject money into the economy.This approach supports growth and reduces the burden of private debt. Empirical evidence shows that economies with higher deficits often perform better. The Great Depression and the 2008 Financial Crisis were both exacerbated by austerity measures. When governments cut spending, they shrink the economy and increase private debt.We need to rethink our approach to fiscal policy. Austerity is not the solution; it's the problem.
1. Edmund Burke, a political thinker known for opposing the French Revolution, predicted the disastrous consequences of radical changes aimed at improving society, such as the Great Leap Forward in China and Soviet farming reforms.
2. Burke argued that radical changes based on abstract ideas, rather than accumulated wisdom and tradition, often lead to chaos and destruction.
3. He believed society and government should evolve organically, like a tree, rather than being dismantled and redesigned by individuals who overestimate their reasoning abilities.
4. Burke's views highlight the importance of tradition, experience, and gradual reform, warning that good intentions alone cannot prevent disasters.
5. While some radical changes, like the New Deal and the creation of the NHS, have been successful, Burke's insights remind us to be cautious and considerate when implementing reforms.
1. **Practical Politician and Pragmatic Thinker**: Edmund Burke, unlike traditional philosophers, was a practical politician in late 18th century England. He focused on the connection between political theory and political practice, emphasizing what works in a representative legislature.
2. **Conservative yet Reform-minded**: Although often seen as conservative, Burke supported the American Revolution, opposed corruption in the East India Company, and advocated for better treatment of Ireland. He balanced the need for reform with the necessity of political stability.
3. **Empirical Approach**: Burke prioritized empirical data and practical outcomes over utopian ideals. He believed in gradual, well-considered reforms to prevent revolutionary violence, emphasizing the importance of historical experience and common sense in political decision-making.
4. **Skepticism of Abstract Theorizing**: Burke criticized the abstract rationalism of continental thinkers like Rousseau, arguing that such theories, when applied in practice, led to chaos and terror, as exemplified by the French Revolution.
5. **Political Parties and Loyal Opposition**: Burke was one of the first to argue that political parties are not only legitimate but necessary for the functioning of representative legislatures. He supported the concept of virtual representation, where representatives act for the good of the nation rather than just local interests.
- Edmund Burke, an 18th-century Irish statesman and philosopher, was a strong critic of the French Revolution.
- In "Reflections on the Revolution in France," Burke expressed concerns about the Revolution's emphasis on abstract principles and rationality.
- He believed this focus ignored the complexities of human nature, emotional, and historical aspects of society.
- Burke argued that neglecting these dimensions would lead to chaos and destruction.
- He advocated for tradition and gradual change, opposing abrupt and radical upheavals, as he believed they would disrupt societal balance and lead to adverse consequences.
1. **Book and Author Focus**: The discussion centers on Edmund Burke's "Reflections on the Revolution in France," highlighting its significance in conservative political philosophy. Burke is noted for his critical view of the French Revolution and his support for tradition and societal continuity.
2. **Contrast with Liberalism**: Burke's perspective contrasts sharply with both modern and classical liberalism. He viewed the French Revolution as a destructive force against inherited traditions, whereas he supported the American Revolution for adhering to and adapting British traditions.
3. **Political Philosophy and Tradition**: Burke emphasized the importance of tradition, prescription, and prejudice in politics. He argued that abstract principles like freedom and justice need to be grounded in societal traditions to prevent chaos and tyranny.
4. **American and French Revolutions**: The podcast discusses Burke's nuanced view on revolutions, supporting the American Revolution due to its constitutional basis and criticizing the French Revolution for its radicalism and resulting bloodshed.
5. **Empirical Approach and Practical Politics**: Burke's arguments are rooted in empirical observations and practical politics rather than abstract reasoning. He valued experience and tradition in shaping political systems, advocating for the preservation and cautious adaptation of societal norms.
## Summary: Burke's Critique of the French Revolution
**Edmund Burke**, a prominent political philosopher, is often credited with laying the foundation for modern conservatism through his critique of the French Revolution.
While the revolution initially inspired enthusiasm among many, Burke's perspective sharply diverged. He saw it as a radical departure from established order and tradition, a dangerous experiment based on abstract ideals rather than practical wisdom.
**Key points of Burke's argument:**
* **Tradition and Experience:** Burke emphasized the importance of tradition and historical experience in shaping sound political systems. He argued that the French Revolution's attempt to radically restructure society based on abstract principles was misguided.
* **Limited Government:** Burke supported limited government and constitutional monarchy, believing they provided essential checks on power and protected individual liberties.
* **Social Order:** He emphasized the importance of social hierarchy and institutions like the Church in maintaining stability and cohesion.
* **Gradual Reform:** Burke advocated for gradual, organic change rather than abrupt revolution, arguing that rapid transformations often lead to unintended consequences.
In contrast to the French revolutionaries' focus on individual rights, Burke prioritized the collective wisdom embodied in established institutions and traditions. He believed that true liberty was rooted in a balanced society, where authority and order coexisted with individual freedoms.
- **Critique of Radicalism:** Edmund Burke's "Reflections on the Revolution in France" (1790) is a sharp critique of the French Revolution, which he saw as driven by dangerous and misguided radicalism.
- **Lack of Clear Plan:** Burke argued that the revolutionaries had overthrown the existing order without a clear plan for its replacement, leading to chaos and bloodshed.
- **Utopian Ideals vs. Reality:** He believed the revolutionaries aimed to create a utopia based on abstract ideals, ignoring the complexities of human nature and society.
- **Gradual Reform and Tradition:** Burke advocated for gradual reform guided by tradition and the accumulated wisdom of previous generations, opposing violent revolution.
- **Impact and Legacy:** The book was influential in its time and remains significant in political thought, offering insights into political change, the role of tradition, and the balance between individual freedom and social order.
03:31 to insults with insults we know that that isn't the way that we're commanded to respond as Paul says in Romans 12 and as Peter says in the next chapter we shouldn't repay insult for insult or evil with evil we need to emulate Christ who didn't repay insult for insult and instead trusted God to judge justly so does this mean that we shouldn't be angry of course not be angry but don't sin in your anger nor does this mean that we should just ignore it and not let our voices be heard in fact one way 04:00 that we can respond is the boycott like George jenko said so this doesn't mean that we should just sit and do nothing instead we need to let our voices be heard
1. **Concerns Over Trump's Potential Election**: Prof. Mearsheimer discusses fears in the West regarding a possible Trump administration, which could shift policies, impacting NATO's strength and Ukraine's situation negatively. He argues that Trump's election could debunk the inevitability of Ukraine joining NATO.
2. **NATO and Ukraine's Struggles**: Mearsheimer highlights the dire state of Ukraine in the ongoing conflict, noting their battlefield losses and NATO's internal issues. He asserts that despite efforts from the Biden administration to show strength, the rhetoric may not be effective.
3. **Biden Administration's Messaging**: The administration aims to reassure Ukraine, address American public concerns, and send a message to Russia about long-term commitment, though Mearsheimer views these efforts as delusional and ineffective.
4. **Criticism of Western Foreign Policy**: Mearsheimer criticizes the West's optimism about Ukraine's prospects in the war, asserting that Russia is in a stronger position and that Western support for Ukraine could lead to a prolonged conflict without meaningful resolution.
5. **Negotiation Challenges and Future Outlook**: He argues that serious negotiations require accepting Russia's terms, which the West is unwilling to do. He predicts a potential frozen conflict, with the West and Russia causing ongoing problems for each other, and views a meaningful peace agreement as unlikely.
各国の文学はよく知らんけど、それっぽい、よな。
