2025年8月5日火曜日

南京大虐殺も広島・長崎大虐殺も非戦闘員大虐殺　日本軍慰安婦も米軍慰安婦も性奴隷

 

 

 原発推進派だけど、反対の歌を出したかったらだすべきだし、出してあげるべき。 これは東さんが別に悪くないんじゃない？

私も南京虐殺はあった派だが、否認派の発言を封殺すべきではない。


 町山智浩 reposted このように否認派には言論で対抗すべき。

 町山智浩 reposted 町山さんらがずるいのは韓国人日本軍慰安婦と全く同じように搾取されていた韓国人米軍慰安婦については完全沈黙すること。

  Sex Among Allies:

 統一教会の世界日報社と提携してる米紙クリスチャン・サイエンス・モニター出身

Gemini
 In summary, while both organizations have a religious foundation and have created their own media outlets, there is no relationship between The Christian Science Monitor and the Unification Church. They are separate entities with different origins, beliefs, and media portfolios. 
 Perplexity 
In summary, the Christian Science Monitor and the Unification Church are entirely separate organizations with no direct or historical relationship.
Chat GPT
The relationship between the Christian Science Monitor (CSM) and the Unification Church, founded by Sun Myung Moon, has been a topic of discussion and scrutiny over the years. Sun Myung Moon, who established the Unification Church in 1954, had significant influence in various media ventures, including the Washington Times newspaper and, for a period, the ownership of the Christian Science Monitor.

In 1984, the Unification Church acquired the Christian Science Monitor's broadcast operations, including its television station. This acquisition led to some concerns about editorial independence and the potential influence of the Unification Church's ideology on the Monitor's reporting. However, it's important to note that the Christian Science Monitor, known for its independent journalism and non-sensational reporting style, maintained a separate editorial board and operated independently despite the ownership connection.

In 2009, the Christian Science Church, the parent organization of the Christian Science Monitor, reacquired full control of the Monitor, thus severing any direct ties with the Unification Church. Since then, the Christian Science Monitor continues to operate as an independent news organization known for its global coverage and objective reporting.

Overall, while there was a period of ownership overlap between the Unification Church and the Christian Science Monitor, the Monitor has historically maintained its journalistic integrity and independence in reporting news.

ChatGPT

 The relationship between The Washington Times and The Christian Science Monitor is notably distinct. The Washington Times is known for its conservative editorial stance and has been owned by organizations associated with the Unification Church. On the other hand, The Christian Science Monitor is an international news organization that operates independently, known for its balanced reporting and editorial independence from religious affiliations, despite its founding by the Christian Science movement. While both are newspapers, they differ significantly in ownership, editorial approach, and audience focus.


CSMは統一教会とは全然関係なさそうじゃん。

 

Grok 

The post by @buvery2　 challenges the narrative around the Nanjing Massacre by highlighting the complex geopolitical context, noting that at the time of Nanjing's fall in 1937, China’s Nationalist government was briefly aligned with Nazi Germany＊, while Japan opposed this alliance, a fact often overshadowed by modern historical focus on Japanese aggression.

It references the Shanghai Incident of August 1937 and the Second United Front formed in September 1937, where the Chinese Communist Party and Nationalist forces united against Japan, suggesting that both sides engaged in significant internal conflict, including the Communists killing Nationalist troops, supported by declassified Japanese military records and Western eyewitness accounts like those of F. Tillman Durdin.

Historical revisionism is supported by evidence from the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (1946-1948), which estimated 200,000 deaths but faced criticism for inconsistencies, with recent studies (e.g., Oxford Research Encyclopedia, 2020) indicating a range of 40,000 to 300,000, reflecting ongoing debates influenced by nationalistic agendas on both sides.


＊China–Germany relations (1913–1941) - WikipediaQuote: "Nazi Germany and the Nationalist government of the Republic of China maintained bilateral relations between 1933 and 1941. The Chinese Nationalists sought German military and economic support to help them consolidate control over factional warlords and resist Japanese imperialism. Germany sought raw materials such as tungsten and antimony from China. During the mid-1930s, thousands of Chinese soldiers were trained by German officers and German economic investment made its way into China."

Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–Germany_relations_(1913–1941)

Context: This excerpt highlights the mutual benefits of the alliance, with Germany providing military training and industrial support, while China supplied raw materials, marking a significant period of cooperation until 1941.

 へええ。


原爆の犠牲者 1945年末までに21万 沖縄戦 US兵2万、日本兵10万+住民10万 …本土上陸作戦を行えばこの2倍になるとUSは試算した しかし天秤にかけるロジック自体があり得ないと語る「実況中継」の青木裕司先生
そもそも大量の民間人虐殺をした点で戦争犯罪。 日本人が読むべき本というよりアメリカ人が読むべき本だな。

公平な著作だと思うよ。

町山智浩 reposted 長文、長い動画が駄目なんじゃなくて、展開が遅いのが現代では駄目。

「君の名は」にせよ、「国宝」にせよ、「オッペンハイマー」にせよ、カットや場面や話の展開が早かった。

      
@leeleehl On my run this morning, I gotta carry some cold water bottles with me next time. At least I was able to cool them down a little bit. #japan #leeleeinjapan #kyotango #construction #running ♬ original sound - AMERICAN BADDIE
　親しみを感じてやっているのはわかるが、日本にいて日本の住民に英語で話しかけてどうする・・・・英会話教室じゃないんだから・・・・植民地主義が心の底から身についてしまって、なにが悪いのかわからんのかも？

 buveryさんがリポスト これは怖いね。とくに海外にいく若い人たちは知ってっておくべき。
時刻:

0 件のコメント:

コメントを投稿

登録: コメントの投稿 (Atom)

Takaichi is discussing Japan’s role in supporting U.S. naval operations in response to China’s actions.

これ、朝日は巧妙に論点をズラしてるけど、問題は、変更前の見出しの「武力行使」が日本側の行為を指してるのに対し、変更後の「武力攻撃」は中国側の行為を指してる点。つまり、武力を仕掛けるのが前者は日本、後者は中国で正反対。駐大阪総領事は前者の見出しの朝日のXに引用ポストをしたので...