”the ability to be alone is the condition for the ability to love.”

スロヴェニアがユーロヴィジョンでイスラエルの資格停止を正式に申し立てたとな。この流れ、オランダ・アイルランドも続きそうではある。 https://t.co/BC1Ve72Ybg

— kazukazu (@kazukazu881) December 22, 2024

　いままで何も言わなかった出羽守もおかしい。要するに欧州左派ないしリベラルの言っていることを口パクしているだけ。

　もっごも、欧米右翼の立場をなぞっているだけの保守も日本にはいるようだが・・

分析的思考と陰謀論にハマりにくさの相関関係についての論文はすでにあるようですが、現代社会においてSNSが陰謀論にハマる基本的な経路だという前提に立つなら、大学による能力の改善の効果を無視しても、「有意義な時間」の提供によるSNSで過ごす時間を減少させることは陰謀論の予防になるのでは？ https://t.co/vPZJlo40Zc

— kazukazu (@kazukazu881) December 22, 2024

Poe 

The relationship between conspiracy theories and educational level is a complex and nuanced topic. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Educational Attainment and Skepticism

Higher educational levels often correlate with increased critical thinking skills. Individuals with advanced education may be more equipped to analyze information critically, which can lead to skepticism towards conspiracy theories.

Conversely, education does not automatically immunize individuals against believing in conspiracy theories; some may still hold these beliefs regardless of their educational background.

2. Social and Psychological Factors

Psychological factors, such as a need for certainty and control, can drive individuals towards conspiracy theories, regardless of their education level.

Social factors, including group identity and community beliefs, can also influence susceptibility to conspiracy theories. People may adopt these beliefs to align with their social circles.

3. Media Literacy

Education can enhance media literacy, enabling individuals to discern credible sources from unreliable ones. This skill is vital in an era of misinformation and can help reduce the spread of conspiracy theories.

4. Research Findings

Some studies suggest that people with lower levels of education may be more prone to conspiracy thinking, while others indicate that highly educated individuals can also embrace conspiracies, particularly when they align with their existing beliefs.

5. Cognitive Biases

Cognitive biases, such as confirmation bias (favoring information that confirms existing beliefs), can affect individuals across all educational levels, potentially leading them to accept conspiracy theories.

Conclusion

While there is a general trend indicating that higher education may reduce belief in conspiracy theories, it is not a definitive rule. Factors such as psychological predispositions, social influences, and cognitive biases play significant roles in shaping beliefs about conspiracy theories.

教育レベルと陰謀論に対する信念の関係は複雑です。一般的に、高い教育を受けた人々は陰謀論への信念が減少する傾向がありますが、これは決定的なルールではありません。心理的な傾向、社会的影響、認知バイアスなどが、陰謀論に対する信念の形成に重要な役割を果たしています

とのことです。なるほどね。

 

The results of the study revealed that overall, people who were married or in a relationship had the highest life satisfaction and emotional well-being. People who were involuntarily single but would like to have a partner were the least happy. People who chose to be single or were between relationships had medium levels of life satisfaction and emotional well-being. 全体として、結婚しているか関係にある人々が最も高い生活満足度と感情的な幸福を持っていることが明らかになりました。パートナーを望んでいるが自発的にシングルである人々は最も幸せではないことがわかりました。シングルでいることを選んだ人々や関係が一時的に途切れている人々は、中程度の生活満足度と感情的な幸福を持っていることがわかりました。

between relatoinships って関係が一時的に途切れているっていう意味かあ・・・・Copilotって頭いいな。

When people in bad relationships were compared to singles, it was found that people in bad relationships spent more time being unhappy than single people. Moreover, single people had higher life satisfaction than those in bad relationships.

Taken together, the results suggest that both those who are involuntarily single and those in bad relationships experience lower life satisfaction and emotional well-being than people who are married or in a good relationship. However, being in a bad relationship appears to be worse than being involuntarily single.

そうだろうなあ。

いい関係カップル　＞　自発的シングル　＞　非自発的シングル　＞　悪い関係カップル

にも関わらず、悪い関係を維持し続ける夫婦っているよなあ・・・・夫婦ってのは複雑な

関係だよなああ。

 

lollipop lady

子供が学校の近くで道を安全に横断するのを助けるために雇われた女性

ややウケかな。

“Paradoxically, the ability to be alone is the condition for the ability to love.”

— Erich Fromm pic.twitter.com/n3Y6ZIhSvY

— Philosophy Quotes (@philosophors) January 4, 2024

Erich Fromm’s statement, "The ability to be alone is a condition for the ability to love," reflects his belief that true love is rooted in emotional independence and self-awareness. According to Fromm, to love another person genuinely, one must first be comfortable with themselves and capable of being alone without feeling anxious or incomplete. Here’s a breakdown of what he might mean:

1. **Self-fulfillment**: Fromm argues that individuals need to be secure in themselves, with a sense of self-worth and personal fulfillment. If someone is overly dependent on others for validation or emotional support, they may struggle to engage in love that is truly unconditional or selfless. Being alone allows a person to cultivate their own identity, interests, and emotional stability.

2. **Independence in relationships**: Being comfortable with solitude doesn't mean isolation or detachment, but rather having the strength and emotional autonomy to enter a relationship without losing one's sense of self. Love, in Fromm’s view, is not about needing the other person to complete you, but about sharing your life with someone while maintaining your own individuality.

3. **Self-love**: Fromm also emphasizes the importance of self-love, which is different from selfishness. To truly love others, one must first care for and respect themselves. The ability to be alone allows a person to develop this healthy self-love, which forms the foundation for loving others in a mature and balanced way.

In essence, Fromm suggests that the ability to be alone gives individuals the freedom and emotional strength to engage in deep, authentic relationships. If a person is unable to be alone or comfortable in solitude, they may seek out relationships out of loneliness or fear, which can distort the nature of love.

 

 人が一人でいることや孤独に慣れていない場合、孤独感や恐怖感から関係を求めることがあり、それが愛の性質を歪めることがある。」

 これだな。

イエスの話は、いわゆる新約聖書の中に書いてあることが知られている全てですが、ローマ人がイエスを処刑した記録があることから、イエスは実在したと言えるのでしょう。

— buvery (@buvery2) December 22, 2024

ローマ人がイエスを処刑した記録があることから、イエスは実在したと言えるのでしょう

The crucifixion of Jesus was the death of Jesus by being nailed to a cross.[note 1] It occurred in 1st-century Judaea, most likely in AD 30 or AD 33

 

The Roman historian and senator Tacitus referred to Jesus, his execution by Pontius Pilate, and the existence of early Christians in Rome in his final work, Annals (written c. AD 116), book 15, chapter 44.[1]

イエスの処刑後　83－86年後に書かれたわけだね

Sources used by Tacitus

The majority of scholars consider the passage to be genuinely by Tacitus. However, he does not reveal the source of his information. For this reason, some scholars have debated the historical value of the passage.[59]

Gerd Theissen and Annette Merz argue that Tacitus at times had drawn on earlier historical works now lost to us, and he may have used official sources from a Roman archive in this case; however, if Tacitus had been copying from an official source, some scholars would expect him to have labelled Pilate correctly as a prefect rather than a procurator.[60] Theissen and Merz state that Tacitus gives us a description of widespread prejudices about Christianity and a few precise details about "Christus" and Christianity, the source of which remains unclear.[61] However, Paul Eddy has stated that given his position as a senator, Tacitus was also likely to have had access to official Roman documents of the time and did not need other sources.[29]

Scholars have also debated the issue of hearsay in the reference by Tacitus. Charles Guignebert argued that "So long as there is that possibility [that Tacitus is merely echoing what Christians themselves were saying], the passage remains quite worthless".[62] R. T. France states that the Tacitus passage is at best just Tacitus repeating what he had heard through Christians.[63] However, Paul Eddy has stated that as Rome's preeminent historian, Tacitus was generally known for checking his sources and was not in the habit of reporting gossip.[29]

何に基づいて書かれたかは不明

それでも、

The scholarly consensus is that Tacitus's reference to the execution of Jesus by Pontius Pilate is both authentic, and of historical value as an independent Roman source.

学者たちの一致した見解によれば、タキトゥスがポンティウス・ピラトによるイエスの処刑について言及した記録は、信憑性があり、独立したローマの史料として歴史的価値があるとされています。

と。

　イエスが歴史的実在したかいなかにかかわらず、聖書の価値は認めているから、どっちでもいいんだけど、おれはどっちかというと懐疑的なほうかな・・・・

 

Copilot による説明と解釈

Vincent van Gogh's *Pieta* (1889) is a striking and evocative interpretation of the biblical scene in which the Virgin Mary cradles the dead body of Jesus Christ. This painting is remarkable not only for its religious content but also for the emotional intensity and unique style van Gogh brings to the subject.

### Description and Interpretation

1. **Subject Matter**:

   - The *Pieta* is a traditional Christian theme depicting the sorrowful moment after the crucifixion of Jesus. Van Gogh's interpretation shows Mary holding her son, conveying a deep sense of grief and compassion.

2. **Emotional Intensity**:

   - Van Gogh's version is known for its raw emotional power. The expressions and body language of the figures are depicted with a profound sense of sorrow and tenderness. The use of bold, expressive brushstrokes enhances the emotional impact, making the viewer feel the intensity of the scene.

3. **Color and Technique**:

   - The color palette is rich and vibrant, typical of van Gogh's style. The use of strong blues, reds, and yellows creates a dramatic and almost otherworldly atmosphere. Van Gogh's thick application of paint, known as impasto, adds texture and depth to the painting, making it feel almost three-dimensional.

4. **Personal Connection**:

   - This painting was created during a time when van Gogh was hospitalized in Saint-Rémy-de-Provence. It reflects his own struggles with mental health and his search for solace and meaning through art and spirituality. The *Pieta* can be seen as a manifestation of van Gogh's empathy and his own quest for redemption and understanding.

### Significance

- **Artistic Influence**: Van Gogh's interpretation of the *Pieta* is influenced by his admiration for other artists, such as Eugène Delacroix, whose work also inspired him. This painting exemplifies how van Gogh integrated his influences into his unique artistic vision.

- **Symbolism**: The *Pieta* serves as a symbol of suffering, compassion, and hope. It highlights the universal themes of loss and love, making it relatable and poignant for viewers from different backgrounds.

### Conclusion

Van Gogh's *Pieta* is a powerful and moving artwork that transcends its religious theme to touch upon universal human emotions. It showcases van Gogh's ability to convey deep emotion through his distinctive style and technique, making it a significant piece in his body of work.

If you have any more questions or would like to explore another artwork, feel free to let me know! 😊

イエスが歴史的実在したかどうかは・・・どうでもよくて、その物語の意味が大事。 

 

 いじめで自殺事件・・・・子どもってのは想像を絶するほど残酷になれるもんなんだよな。